One month only?

Taken from theStar's article;

"The Government will install closed-circuit televisions (CCTVs) in major cities next year, said deputy Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Hamzah Zainudin. He said the "mobile" CCTVs, which can rotate 360 degrees, would be able to record objects about 200 metres away and the records could be kept for a month. We will install the 'mobile' CCTVs together with 496 CCTVs in major cities including Kuala Lumpur, Malacca and Penang soon. The first phase, costing RM75mil, is expected to completed by April next year."

What? Records could be keep for a month? Haha.. almost laughable!

And then you read on, 496 CCTVs for RM75million. That's like RM150K per CCTV. No mention of the bidding process although I'll love to get my hands on this project!

Island man he is.

Taken from theSun page2 article and this is coming from the man chosen as the candidate from Umno, he said;

"He admitted that the BN machinery was conducting the campaign in a way that was not in line with his own but he could not do anything about it. Arif Shah, in the end, set up his own election machinery and used his own funds to print posters... The most glaring sign was that despite having a by-election operations centre, Arif Shah was found operating from his home base in Seberang Jaya... He said he did not have any access to the election machinery at all and that “it operated on its own agenda and strategy”... It was a difficult campaign for the amiable Arif Shah. It is learnt that while the Umno by-election machinery was up and running and many BN posters and streamers were printed, none of these were accessible to the candidate."

It is obvious that even Umno own by-election machinery is not in 'taking terms' with it's chosen candidate, what makes people think that this candidate will have the ears of the biggest party in BN?

I can put it, in another words, he was 'sodomised' by his own party. No?

Partners-in-crime (2)

It is almost laughable when I found out that our Home Minister is a trained lawyer. Yah, this is the same kepala botak that gave away much more hair to Singapore over the Pulau Puteh.

Now going by to what he had said earlier about an impending commits sodomy case, obviously, it takes two to tango. Now, this sodomised fler has made a police report. Then this kepala botak goes on to say that if one makes a report on it, he/she will be protected by virtue of being a witness. Now.. what if.. the other party also makes a police report. then we have 2 witness, so who's will the police going to charge the crime upon?

hahaha.. kepala botak!

Perompak.

It is this people makes biased statements that makes me sick. This fellow, a minister whom I always thought had a higher IQ than most of the current cabinet ministers said that the government will be deemed as perompak (or robbers) if it demands that Independent Power Producers (IPPs) reduce their charge capacity. His point was obviously to protect the interest of IPPs rather than the government or for that matter the rakyat.

When the government announced the fuel hike to RM2.70/litre on 5th June , the global crude oil was at traded at NYMEX for USD135/barrel. It has since rescinded to USD118/barrel on a steady downward trend.

But then when this happens, you don't hear a lot of intellectual statements from him.

So, is the government a perompak, robbing rakyats in this case when it refuses to lower/review the fuel prices at the pumps? So, what good is our domestic trade and consumer goods is good for?

To me, this is like a new found form of TAX that the government is pocketing without many realizing it. Don't you think so?

WTF

Some people really speaks through their ass.

Partners-in-crime.

Taken from TheStar article, our Home Minister (who he gave away a small yet strategic piece of rock to Singapore) had this to say:

Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan is not being charged because he is the key witness in the sodomy case against PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, said Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar.

He said that in a criminal justice system, when a person comes forward to report on a matter, the person would be protected.

“Usually, the victim is given protection,” Syed Hamid said

Kinda weird answer if you asked me. The thing is, the victim wasn't a victim in this case. It was more like a partner-in-crime. I'll be fine when/if the partner-in-crime comes out to be a witness and gets the cop's protection. But I find it hard to comprehend that this fellow is not charged accordingly to the law of the crimes he committed. Does this minister is to say that, if I robs a bank with you and I reports you to the cops and that I will get away from the crime that I have just committed with you?

Doesn't sound logical right?

And now you know why we lost out a piece of rock to Singapore.

Malaysia Boleh!